Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Assessing Childrens Personal And Social Development: Measuring The Unmeasurable? file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Assessing Childrens Personal And Social Development: Measuring The Unmeasurable? book. Happy reading Assessing Childrens Personal And Social Development: Measuring The Unmeasurable? Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Assessing Childrens Personal And Social Development: Measuring The Unmeasurable? at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Assessing Childrens Personal And Social Development: Measuring The Unmeasurable? Pocket Guide.
More titles to consider

Used- Good: The book will be clean without any major stains or markings,the spine of the book will be in great shape meaning the book still has a lot of life in it, no pages will be missing, the pages may be slightly folded through previous use but not majorly. Used-Very Good: The book will be clean without any major stains or markings, the spine will be in excellent shape with only minor creasing, no pages will be missing and the cover is likely to be very clean. There may be some creasing through previous use but not much. There will be no stains or markings on the book, the cover is clean and crisp, the book will look unread, the only marks there may be are slight bumping marks to the edges of the book where it may have been on a shelf previously.

These book are fine to give as gifts. Note that payment must have cleared and reached us by 12pm to allow eBay enough time to send us the order details. Express shipping is available only to UK customers at present. If your order has not be reached you within a maximum of 14 days, for domestic orders, or 21 days for orders to destinations outside the UK please contact us and we will respond immediately to help. Returning an item should be a hassle free process and it is with us. If you are not happy with your item for any reason within 30 days of purchasing it, just let us know and you may return it.

If the reason for return is a defect or problem for our side, we will pay return shipping. If the reason for return is something else, we are happy to refund the cost of the item when we receive it but we would ask that the customer pay the return shipping cost. To return an item, simply drop us an email and we will get the returns process moving. All returns are normally processed within 7 days of being received. Skip to main content.

Email to friends Share on Facebook - opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter - opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest - opens in a new window or tab. Watch this item. This item is out of stock. Picture Information Free postage. Have one to sell? Sell it yourself. Get an immediate offer. Get the item you ordered or your money back. Learn more - opens in new window or tab.

Contact seller. Visit Shop. See other items More See all. Item information Condition:. Current psychometric measurement of LH strategy involves an unwarranted conflation of functional i.

Rorschach and Freudians: Crash Course Psychology #21

Thus, common psychometric measurement instruments of LH strategy including ALHB, mini-K, and HKKS incorrectly assume reflective measurement models implying that each individual proximate mechanism is conceptually equivalent and, by extension, is a locally independent measurement of the latent LH strategy. In doing so, LH strategy becomes a descriptive construct, giving a meaningful description rather than causal explanation for the observed correlations between LH traits. Acknowledging K-factors as formative and as ultimate prevents conceptual errors, such as inappropriate causal inferences and inappropriate extensions of empirical findings toward theory development.

The use of such a formative measurement model, as discussed, has direct consequences for the parameter estimates in regression models including a psychometric measurement of the K-factor. Although we have shown conceptual problems in considering K-factors measures of LH strategy, we are not disputing that LH strategy theoretically could correspond to a discrete proximate mechanism.

Additionally, our concerns with the psychometric approach do not extend to developmental approaches aiming to explain variation in LH strategies e. However, we leave open the empirical question of whether variation in the bundle of proximate mechanisms captured by K-scales is further reducible to a single proximate mechanism e.

If such a reduction is not possible, researchers need to examine hypotheses about these mechanisms separately as we have suggested. If reduction to a single mechanism is possible, creating latent variable models of LH strategy would be feasible, but it would need to measure LH strategy through direct causal manifestations of such a mechanism.

Nonetheless, analyses of K-factor instruments by Copping et al. What are other possible new directions for the psychometrics of LH strategies? Although this might be a step LH research needs to take to conceptually align theory with measurement, the value of such descriptive constructs in psychological research is far from clear.

In particular, can a descriptive construct summarizing various conceptually different sources of information about individuals be fruitfully used as a predictor of behavioral outcomes? For psychologists interested in examining psychological constructs as causal antecedents of behavior to further psychological theory, such descriptive variables may be of little theoretical value. As Richardson et al. Other scholars e. Instead, network models take an intermediate ontological position; they define constructs in terms of a network of multiple interacting manifestations.

This approach might prove to be of particular value to researchers interested in modeling functionally defined constructs, such as LH strategy, because functions may very well be examined through a network of proximate mechanisms. In conclusion, the conflation of ultimate and proximate causes in the evolutionary behavioral sciences is not a problem unique to LH measurement for a discussion, see Scott-Phillips et al.

Proximate models of behavior lose their conceptual clarity—and indeed their causal explanatory potential—when ultimate factors referring to fitness effects are included. How to properly use ultimate explanations in proximate empirical models remains an important issue for progress in evolutionary behavioral science. In our view, the specification of formative measurement models when describing and testing functionally defined constructs might be a first important conceptual step.

The authors are thankful to George Richardson for motivating correspondence prior to the development of this manuscript. We are also thankful to three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. As part of his dissertation work, he focussed on the applications of evolutionary theory in the field of health psychology. Further research interests include conceptual, methodological, and psychometric issues relevant to evolutionary approaches to psychology.

His current research mainly focuses on the topic of sustainable employability, and specifically its definition, its measurement as a formative construct, and its predictors. Further research interests include work and organizational and social psychology, evolutionary approaches to behaviour, and psychometrics. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Human Nature Hawthorne, N. Hum Nat. Published online Nov Stefan L. Gruijters 1, 2 and Bram P.

Fleuren 1. Bram P. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Gruijters, Email: ln. Corresponding author. Abstract Within evolutionary biology, life-history theory is used to explain cross-species differences in allocation strategies regarding reproduction, maturation, and survival. Keywords: Life history strategy, Ultimate-proximate distinction, Measurement models, Psychometrics, Formative models, Latent variables, Validity.

Table 1 The mini-K questionnaire from Figueredo et al.


  • Supercentenarians.
  • See a Problem?.
  • Essentials of Short-Range Wireless.

Item 1. I can often tell how things will turn out.

I try to understand how I got into a situation to figure out how to handle it. I often find the bright side to a bad situation. I often make plans in advance. I avoid taking risks.

Bahir Dar Univeristy library catalog › Details for: Assessing personal and social development :

While growing up, I had a close and warm relationship with my biological mother. While growing up, I had a close and warm relationship with my biological father. I have a close and warm relationship with my own children. I have a close and warm romantic relationship with my sexual partner. I would rather have one than several sexual relationships at a time. I have to be closely attached to someone before I am comfortable having sex with them. I am often in social contact with my blood relatives.

I often get emotional support and practical help from my blood relatives. I often give emotional support and practical help to my blood relatives. I am often in social contact with my friends. I often get emotional support and practical help from my friends. I often give emotional support and practical help to my friends. I am closely connected to and involved in my community. I am closely connected to and involved in my religion. Open in a separate window. Modeling Life-History Strategy as a Proximate Variable The question of whether LH strategy can qualify as a reflective latent variable is complicated by the multiple levels of analyses evolutionary science involves in its research.

An Alternative Approach: Formative Models To deflate the proximate-ultimate distinction in K-factor models, we suggest that LH strategy could be modeled as a formative construct, one that is descriptive of an individual, similar to SES.

Associated Data

Discussion We have argued that because a discrete proximate mechanism corresponding to LH strategy such as the K-factor cannot be assumed, current approaches do not succeed in measuring reflections of such a latent variable. Acknowledgments The authors are thankful to George Richardson for motivating correspondence prior to the development of this manuscript.

Shop with confidence

Biographies Stefan L. References Alessi G. Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. The American Psychologist.

Join Kobo & start eReading today

Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology. Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates.

Psychological Methods. In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective. Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. If a child dissociates often, this will also affect behavior.

Complexly traumatized children are more likely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as self-harm, unsafe sexual practices, and excessive risk-taking such as operating a vehicle at high speeds. Children with complex trauma histories may have problems thinking clearly, reasoning, or problem solving. They may be unable to plan ahead, anticipate the future, and act accordingly. When children grow up under conditions of constant threat, all their internal resources go toward survival.

When their bodies and minds have learned to be in chronic stress response mode, they may have trouble thinking a problem through calmly and considering multiple alternatives. They may find it hard to acquire new skills or take in new information. They may struggle with sustaining attention or curiosity or be distracted by reactions to trauma reminders.

They may show deficits in language development and abstract reasoning skills. Many children who have experienced complex trauma have learning difficulties that may require support in the academic environment. Children learn their self-worth from the reactions of others, particularly those closest to them.

Shopping Cart

Abuse and neglect make a child feel worthless and despondent. A child who is abused will often blame him- or herself. It may feel safer to blame oneself than to recognize the parent as unreliable and dangerous. Shame, guilt, low self-esteem, and a poor self-image are common among children with complex trauma histories. To plan for the future with a sense of hope and purpose, a child needs to value him- or herself.

Children surrounded by violence in their homes and communities learn from an early age that they cannot trust, the world is not safe, and that they are powerless to change their circumstances. Beliefs about themselves, others, and the world diminish their sense of competency. Their negative expectations interfere with positive problem-solving, and foreclose on opportunities to make a difference in their own lives. They have trouble feeling hopeful. The Adverse Childhood Experiences ACE Study is a longitudinal study that explores the long-lasting impact of childhood trauma into adulthood.

The ACE Study includes over 17, participants ranging in age from 19 to Results demonstrated the connection between childhood trauma exposure, high-risk behaviors e. The cumulative economic and social burden of complex trauma in childhood is extremely high. Costs for these nonfatal cases of child maltreatment are comparable to other high-cost health conditions i.

Such immeasurable losses may be the most significant cost of child maltreatment. Back to top Effects.

Complex trauma can affect children in a multitude of ways.